LESSON 5
THE RESPONSE TO THE WITNESSING IN ACTS
THE
RESPONSE
OF
THOSE
WHO
HEARD
THE
MESSAGE
THROUGHOUT
ACTS
ACTS
8,
9
INTRODUCTION
In our study of Acts we have
examined Jesus’ instruction to the Apostles, their apostolic
witnessing (preaching), and what some people did in response to that
teaching. In this lesson we
will examine in some detail three responses to the apostolic witnessing.
First, we will follow Philip, who though not an Apostle, was certainly
an “apostolic” person in that he had heard the Apostles’
preaching, and had most likely been converted by one or more of the
Apostles. As a result of
the persecution and martyrdom of Stephen, the disciples in Jerusalem
were scattered abroad. They
took the Gospel message of Jesus with them and continued the
“apostolic” witnessing. In
Acts 8 we find Philip in a city of Samaria (remember, Jesus had
instructed the Apostles to begin witnessing in Jerusalem, then to go to
Judea, Samaria, and the end of the earth).
SIMON THE SORCERER (Acts 8:9-25)
It would be nice if we knew more about Simon!
What we know certainly makes and interesting story!
Apparently Simon was a former worker of magic.
However, Simon, along with many other citizens of the Samaritan
town where Simon lived, was impressed with Philip’s preaching of the
good news concerning the kingdom and Jesus.
He and others believed and were baptized.
However, things took a somewhat downward turn when Simon,
impressed by the power that was associated with the laying on of the
Apostles’ hands, desired the same power of laying on hands and
imparting the Holy Spirit gifts. Simon
was challenged to examine
his heart and to repent of his improper desires for power. Apparently he did since he asked for prayers in his behalf.
PHILIP
AND THE ETHIOPIAN EUNUCH (Acts 8: 26-39)
The conversion and salvation of the Ethiopian eunuch is one of the most
fascinating events of Acts. The
Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of Queen Candace of Ethiopia, had
made a journey to Jerusalem to worship.
We have no details regarding his background! He was most likely a proselyte to Judaism, since he had been
to Jerusalem to worship at the time of one of the Jewish festivals.
On his way home to Ethiopia, and while in the desert of Gaza, he
was reading from the book of Isaiah. Philip
had been encouraged by an angel to go to a point on the road from
Jerusalem to Gaza.
Somewhere in the desert Philip encountered the Ethiopian.
Being encouraged by the Holy Spirit to join the Ethiopian in his
chariot, he asked the Ethiopian whether he understood what he was
reading. The Ethiopian
responded that he needed a guide to understand what he was reading.
Philip took advantage of the seeming invitation and beginning
where the Ethiopian was reading he preached the good news of Jesus to
the Ethiopian. We are not
informed just what he told the Ethiopian, but following the apostolic
preaching of Acts, he must have preached the death, burial, and
resurrection of Jesus to the Ethiopian in such clarity that the
Ethiopian believed the message. When
the came to some water hole or oasis in the desert the Ethiopian asked
to be baptized.
The
terms of the request are interesting!
Obviously, the Ethiopian understood that baptism was necessary
and related to the preaching of the death, burial, and resurrection of
Jesus! Furthermore, he
understood that baptism involved water, and more water than he would
have obviously been carrying in his chariot!
Luke tells us that both Philip and the Ethiopian went down
into the water for the baptism, and then came up out of the
water. Obviously, New Testament, or Christian baptism was by
immersion.
But
what was the purpose of this baptism?
Thus far in Acts we have learned that baptism is associated with
forgiveness of sins (Acts 2: 38). Shortly,
we will learn from Acts 16:30-33 that it was associated with believing
in Jesus and salvation. In
Acts 22:16 we will learn that it was associated with washing away ones
sins. Somehow and for some
reason, people believing in Jesus were baptized!
THE
CONVERSION OF SAUL OF TARSUS (Acts 9:1-31)
No conversion to Christ in all of Christendom compares to that of Saul
of Tarsus! In several of
his epistles Paul recounts his heritage in Judaism. (Paul’s Hebrew
name was Saul of Tarsus. Saul
is known by his Hebrew name through Acts 13:9.
In this passage Luke tells us that Saul is also called Paul. After Acts 13:9, Saul is known by his Roman name, Paul.)
Born in Tarsus in the Roman province of Cilicia to a Jewish
family who apparently were wealthy, having at some time purchased Roman
citizenship, Saul must have been educated at the university of Tarsus,
one of the major universities of the day. Later he had studied under the most famous and highly
respected Jewish scholars, Gamaliel, and had risen above all the
countrymen of his age in the study of Judaism.
He was a Pharisee and member of the tribe of Benjamin.
He had been present at the murder (martyrdom) of Stephen (Acts
8:1) and had consented to the stoning of Stephen. Such was his success
in Judaism that he had been chosen by the Jewish Sanhedrin as a special
envoy to Damascus to persecute Jews in Damascus.
With
the legal papers in hand, he was on his way to Damascus when Jesus
appeared to him, asking why Saul was persecuting him.
So shocked was Saul by the experience that he fell to the ground,
struck blind. He asked who
the one speaking to him in such striking manner was, and upon being told
the it was Jesus speaking, he was instructed to go to Damascus where he
would be told what he must do. In
Damascus a man by the name of Ananias came to visit Saul.
After Ananias had spoken to Saul and restored his sight, Saul
arose and was baptized. Saul later in a defense argument before Jews when he was
arrested in Jerusalem reports that he was instructed by Ananias to rise,
be baptized, and wash away his sins, calling on the name of Jesus – a
Hebraism for believing in Jesus (Acts 22:16).
One
might ask why Saul was baptized! We
have learned already that belief, repentance, and baptism were
fundamental to the apostolic witnessing in Acts.
There was some connection between believing the apostolic
preaching of the good news, that is that Jesus had died, been buried,
and raised, and belief in Jesus, repenting for ones sins, and being
baptized. We will later
learn how Paul, the Apostle (Saul of Tarsus) explained this connection.
After
being baptized, Saul took up the Apostles message and debated with the
Jews over the good news relating to Jesus.
He argued that Jesus was the Son of God, the Christ (the Jewish
Messiah king). After this
he returned to Jerusalem where at first the disciples were afraid of
Saul, and reluctant to receive him.
After Barnabas’ intervention, Saul preached the message if
Jesus, debating and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews (the Jews that
were from a Greek speaking region) that Jesus was the Christ.
So effective was he that the Jews sought to kill Saul. The disciples sent him home to Tarsus where he would have
been much safer.
The
major lesson we learn from Saul’s conversion in Acts 9 was that upon
experiencing Jesus in a most unusual manner, Saul was instructed upon
believing in Jesus to be baptized in order to wash away his sins (Acts
22:16).
SUMMARY
Acts 8, and 9 take the Apostolic witnessing into three interesting
accounts of conversion. The
first relates to Simon, the sorcerer, in Samaria. The second introduces us to the Ethiopian eunuch in the
desert of Gaza. The third
recounts the conversion of Saul of Tarsus, the arch-enemy of the early
disciples in Jerusalem and Judea. In
each case, upon hearing the witness to the death, burial, and
resurrection of Jesus, they believed that Jesus was the Christ, and were
immediately baptized.
Summary
and Discussion
1) What was new about Philip's
preaching in Acts 9? Where was he? What kind of
people was he preaching to? How does this
relate to Jesus' instruction to the
apostles in Acts 1:8? How does this fit
into Luke's scheme and purpose in Acts?
2) What was the message that Philip preached to Simon and what was
Simon's
response?
2) Summarize in your own words the conversion of the Ethiopian
Eunuch, what Philip
preached to him, and what he did in response.
3) Summarize in your own words Paul's conversion. What
triggered it, what did
Jesus tell him, and what was it that Ananias
told Paul to do, and for what purpose?
|